Good story, Not enough for a whole film

Boring

Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

There are moments that feel comical, some horrific, and some downright inspiring but the tonal shifts hardly matter as the end results come to a film that's perfect for this time.

In an artificial Iraqi village, built by the US Army in California's Mojave Desert, soldiers are training before being sent to Iraq. They are playing war games intended to simulate situations that may happen to them in real life in the war-ridden country. In scenarios prepared by trainers villagers are played by real Iraqi immigrants. It turns out that scripted role-playing in an artificial environment can trigger some real emotions.At least these are the expectations that the makers of this movie try to induce in audience to encourage them to watch it. Yet the story unfolds very slowly and does not reveal any surprising concealed meanings. Don't get me wrong - this story is interesting, it is filmed professionally and it is fun to watch. But if one counts on discovering something that was hidden before the eyes, thinks he will be deeply moved by the unraveled behind-the-scenes mysteries or be left pondering over the shown inconvenient or previously unsaid facts - he will probably be disappointed. Unless he can be satisfied by the "touching", typically American ending, in which we wave good-bye to these brave young boys leaving country to die on the foreign soil.Despite these complaints, I recommend watching this film, because this is quite an interesting picture, showing unknown to the public and unconventional way of training of the contemporary US Army. The movie succeeds in keeping ones attention and some scenes, often very funny, stay in memory for long. Just don't expect to see what the filmmakers are promising - "a full of sarcasm allegory of the war in Iraq". This documentary is straightforward to the bone.My rating: 7/10

I'm used to documentaries about the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan, as well as the political machinations here in the US that are behind them, having a lot more political elements to them. FBR is amazingly neutral in its approach, yet it is quite moving when you listen to the Iraqi immigrants/refugees who work with the US troops training there.Before I saw this film, an acquaintance warned me that it would be "unblievable." I asked him in what sense. He seemed sure that I would be shocked that US troops do this type of training. I had to disappoint him...of course some US troops have the opportunity to train this way. I wouldn't want it any other way. You can argue about the wisdom of being involved in these conflicts, but I would never begrudge US troops the best equipment, weapons, and training possible. Further, I firmly believe (after watching FBR) that this is one of the best ways to minimize casualties on both sides. (As a sidelight, I will also admit that I have never understood why some people are so fascinated with Area 51. Why wouldn't the military have a location to develop new aircraft designs in secret? And wouldn't they guard access to it? And wouldn't you EXPECT it to be secretive?) As a parting shot in my review, I do want to address people (including a reviewer or two on the Web) who seem to believe that US troops should be exercising their political influence on the US position re Iraq and Afghanistan. This scares me a bit. Certainly, as voters and politically-involved citizens/permanent residents, members of the military should be involved in US politics. But the military itself should be under civilian control. It's OUR job to employ them wisely.Definitely recommended for those who are interested in military training and how we try to prepare our troops for the indescribable.

Full Battle Rattle had its North American Premiere this week at the SXSW Film Festival in Austin, TX. It is peculiar and somewhat surreal film that takes an unusually non-judgmental approach to this controversial war. The audience observes the bizarre scene of soldiers and Iraqi-American actors playing war in a fake Iraqi town at the National Training Center at Fort Irwin in California's Mojave Desert. While the filming and graphics are reasonably well-done in a technical sense, the whole experience that we are witnessing feels fake and inauthentic.The film raises a host of important ethical questions which it refuses to engage. The major one is: Does this training help the soldiers prepare for a war that isn't a game? The whole idea that war is a game and that success is learning to play the game better is troubling. It suggests that the military is completely disconnected from the political consequences of the war. The real Iraq is infinitely more complicated than any war game and at the end all the players do not get up and go home. Death is present, but only as it would be on a movie set. After all, all the blood is fake.Sadly, the film sometimes feels like a propaganda video for how well the Army is training to fight the war rather than a serious attempt to analyze and document. Obviously, the filmmakers had to cooperate with the US Army to make the film and the end product suggests that doing so has compromised the integrity of the project. Unfortunately, we are not provided any outside commentary on the effectiveness of the training techniques by outside scholar or critics. The audience is left with only our own uninformed inferences to speculate on what they are seeing. This project cried out for a broader contextual framework.The film seems to implicitly accept President Bush's logic of the "surge" (which we hear the President explaining at one point late in the film). The logic is that all we need is more troops performing better to win the war. Nobody asks if the war is winnable or not. That is simply assumed. This is also the logic that is accepted by the obedient soldiers and the Iraqi immigrants who are eager to please their new government. But it is a flawed logic that offer no real direction for ending the insurgency which can only be resolved through politics, not simply through military action.The most interesting elements of the film are the personal stories of the Iraqi immigrants and the soldiers when they are themselves instead of being "in character," but this part of the story is unfortunately under-developed. A greater emphasis on the human side could have produced a more effective film.Perhaps the most disturbing element of the film is the very existence of this facility which suggests the Army's long-term commitment to staying in Iraq. They are apparently planning to build a "fake" Afghan village there as well. The training facility and the efforts that they are going through are technically impressive (as is the film about them), but whether this training one will do the soldiers, the United States, and Iraq any good is not really examined. Like the Bush administration's policy about the war itself, this film is entirely non-reflective. The biggest problem with this film is the underlying assumptions that its structure buys into. The film makers and the Army appear to be playing a game, but the game has no end, no winners, and sadly we are all losers. The Iraq War is a tragedy, not a game and its a shame the film makers didn't seem to realize that.

I saw this film at South by Southwest and enjoyed the film. I thought the cinematography was beautiful and the edit was paced well. My only complaint was the audio mix; some of the dialog was obscured by the music at times.I enjoyed the depth the film makers went into; discussing the "citizen's" lives as well as mentioning the statistics of Iraqi refugees at the end of the film. I would have liked to know more about the soldiers in the film as well as the ones who were said to have died. The film didn't seem to make any attempt to endorse or condemn the War.Over all, the film was very good and was happy I attended. I would certainly recommend anyone attend regardless of their opinion of the War.