Pretty Good

Boring

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.

I watched this film, all of it, and at the end I wondered why?Where was the set-up? Was I supposed to have read something or watched something else to know what this was about? Who or what was the woman in white? Who or what was the girl I think they were after? What was with the blind man? Why did he need to guard the tunnel, could it not have just been blocked with several tons of rock?But as the hero said, it could all be a dream while he was injured on a tour of duty with the army.Perhaps I was just dreaming and did not waste my time on this nonsense.

This movie is perfect for comedy purpose and to entertain the kids but not the movie even to pass the time....seriously are u kidding me...swords vs guns...is this a match? it looked funny to me...what kinda arc were they? speaking so good English playing role of ancient...look like monsters and powerful but stupid....only the princess i like...Ale ya...the princess is so sexy...the movie i just watched her because there was nothing in movie to put my interest in. she is the lucky one to get my interest..her makeup was fine...outfit was perfect...there should be at least one romantic scene when the princess is so hot...the ex-force mercenary should had that chance even in the end like they have peaceful life after war...

As a lower level film maker myself I see many small issues that are distracting from an otherwise entertaining low budget movie. (the "after effects" gunshots/muzzle flashes/ejecting cartridges) coming from air soft style or resin prop guns. this can be distracting as its done way too much, and if they would have rented an armorer, a few real weapons and given more training to the actors on the use of them (for example you don't fire a barrett .50 from the hip while kneeling on a rooftop and actually expect to hit something) it would have helped keep the distractions down. and people watching the movie rather than questioning what they just saw.the acting is not too...bad, a bit more emotion, a little less dumb-a$$/redneck stereo typing and some back-story would be helpful. the camera work is adequate but depending on the shooting conditions it seemed they the must have had a very limited amount of space to film the battle scenes in. with a little more thought and camera work i feel that the limited space used could be made to look like a lot more... it reminded me of shooting in someones backyard. one way or the other that's falls back on the producer for choosing the spot and the DP for not using what he had to its fullest.as for the battle scenes, if the intent was to show overwhelming orc forces than they should have hired more extras, recycling eight people in rubber masks at a time throughout the movie just didn't work for me.I am unsure what they spent the 1.5 mil on for the production, I have seen better production value for about a quarter mil. I could always nickel and dime it further but I really don't see a reason. Overall I liked what I saw and with so much poorly filmed/acted trash out there this was a nice change.

I watched this movie only because I wanted to see just how bad it actually was. Talk about a horrible plot. This movie is soo low budget, the heroine is actually using a Lord of the Rings replica of 'Sting'. I have never before seen a movie rip off such a known piece and try to pass it off as original. Of course, after seeing that, I have to wonder - are all of those orcs wearing Extra's costumes from the Lord of the Rings films? With the number of folks hired to participate in those films, they'd be easy to find and hire in.The only reason I didn't give this movie a '1', is that I enjoyed the cheesy Eastwood impression that the first Sentinel was passing off.