This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.

The acting in this movie is really good.

The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

This version of Jekyll and Hyde has its origins in a stage production of the novel. This is part of the films flaw in that the acting seems to have been pulled right off the stage rather than coming from real life. This shouldn't put you off from seeing this movie since its quite good and is possibly one of the finer adaptations of the story. Sticking closer to the book, or so it seems, it tries to unravel the weird story with Jeykll and Hyde taking up less of the limelight. This is two friends trying to hash out whats going on. Its a refreshing take on the tale and adds nice shading to everything thats going on. Out side of the stage acting that some people use this film really has no flaws other than a bit too much of the chroma-key or blue screen effects that it uses to supplement its backgrounds. There's nothing wrong with it, but it seems to have been over used sand at times I felt like I was watching a video game rather than a movie.Ultimately this is a film to put on your must see list especially if you want to see a good version of a literary classic.

hello we wanted to say that we love this movie. why you asked? here we go the movie is a throw back to the good old days of horror movies.mark redfield role as both jeckyll and mr hyde are good. his co stars are very good in there roles. elena torrez as claire caine is beautiful. kosha engler is very good in her role as dr.jeckyll love. and howell roberts as new role in the film as lord ashton is good in role as dr. jeckyll friend. i admit it not scary but it is a wonderful film to watch. i just wish everyone would pick up this great film on DVD now. we want to thank mark redfield for directed designed written and produced this movie he is all around good guy so support his films. and it was good to meet mark redfield at the shockerfest in modesto cailf this last weekend. joe

A journey through old London by way of the infamous personalities of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde has always been compelling. Mark Redfield's version continues the legacy and will keep you following every moment with keen expectation. Whether you are familiar with the original story or a first time viewer, it will be just as entertaining. Correlations with earlier versions are not really necessary, because this film carries its own individual quality. Young and old will find Jekyll and Hyde worth investigation. The entire production is done professionally with excellent performances, especially by Mr. Redfield. So, cast away any preconceived notions and make seeing this intriguing picture first on your list.

The good Dr. Jekyll discovers a potion that allows him to take a walk on the wild side as the evil Mr. Hyde in this retelling of the classic Robert Lewis Stevenson story. I find it unlikely that any filmmaker will surpass the masterful 1931 version of the story starring Frederic Marsh, but this low-budget version is really quite compelling and effective. I actually prefer it to the dull 1941 version starring Spencer Tracy. Writer/director Mark Redfield, who also gives a lively performance in the showy, dual lead roles, thankfully puts the emphasis on drama and theme rather than gore, and his cast delivers. This film, which seems to be influenced by the Hammer Horror than 'Halloween,' is a very welcome relief from the trashy, unimaginative slasher films that low-budget filmmakers continually try to pawn off on us fans of the genre. I wish more filmmakers currently working in the horror genre would attempt moody period pieces. If we're lucky, perhaps Redfield and company will tackle more of horror's great novels. Frankenstein, anyone? How about Dracula? (Anything to get the taste of 'Van Helsing' out of my mouth.)