Such a frustrating disappointment

Good films always raise compelling questions, whether the format is fiction or documentary fact.

The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.

The movie's not perfect, but it sticks the landing of its message. It was engaging - thrilling at times - and I personally thought it was a great time.

Camera Buff (Polish: "Amator" ("Amateur")) (1979) Life-changing hobby, Man who had or has it all? Stuhr's performance shines. As avid photographer, 7 Could relate to passion's cost. 7 Tanka, literally "short poem", is a form of poetry consisting of five lines, unrhymed, with the 5-7-5-7-7 syllable format. #Tanka #PoemReview

Another of Kieslowski's modern parables, but this time I love it. A man is given a movie camera when his daughter is born, and he's quite taken with it. The film is really interesting, good acting and writing; but I was drawn in by the sympathetic energy of the protagonist. He's just so likable. Perhaps I saw a bit of myself in his obsessive behaviour. There's so much humanity in this film. If the others are like this, I can see why he's so well loved. +6 for a brilliant film about the creative urge +6 bonus points for the scene where he skulls an old-school Pepsi. 10/10, loved it.

Krzysztof Kieslowski started his career by making documentary films. After he had made 9 documentaries he got the chance to make two feature films for the Polish television: Przejscie podziemne (1973) and Personel (1975). This allowed Kieslowski to direct his first film for theaters, Blizna (The Scar, 1976). The government of Poland didn't treat the film well, and it took about twenty years for anyone to see it. In 1979 Krzysztof made Amator (Camera Buff), a film about an amateur cameraman. Amator was his international breakthrough and it was awarded in the Moscow film festival.A well-earning factory man, Filip Mosz buys a 8mm movie camera to film his daughter's early childhood. When the managers of the factory notice Filip's camera, they ask him to make a film about the company's 25th anniversary party. The film unintentionally gets to a local small festival and leads Filip quickly to the world of art-house cinema. But the success has its price and it causes troubles in Filip's work and private life.Even in the very beginning of Filip's career he meets the problems of the Polish censorship. The film he made about the party should not have showed a mysterious eye-glassed man, pigeons on a window sale, businessmen going to the men's room or the performers getting paid. When Filip gets to an agreement with his boss, they get the film to the festival. The further Filip's career goes, the more he messes up with his private life. His wife, Irka Mosz is not happy about his new hobby, neither is his boss but he has to swallow the facts of Filip's 'success'After the first film Filip makes a film about a short stature man, who works at the factory. This doesn't please the boss and he tries to make Filip not to continue making it. While watching Amator, one cannot help but see the connections to Kieslowski's own career. Amator also studies the difficulty of art in Poland during 1970's. As mentioned above, Kieslowski had problems with getting Blizna (The Scar) to the theaters, and it certainly wasn't the only one. The authorities didn't like his documentaries either, but through their own tracks, they had an impact on cinema.Filip's dedication to cinema, makes his personal life hard and in result of that his wife leaves him. This leads Filip to the basic questions of making cinema, to the battle against the society's and his personal censorship. Amator is an ambiguous film with many layers and many meanings. It analyzes the difficult inner crisis in Poland, it researches the mission of cinema art and tells about the moments in the director's life. The earlier films of Kieslowski often got stuck with the Polish censorship and only after Amator he got his stable place in the European art-house cinema.But Amator certainly isn't a description of the harsh life of filmmakers. Krzysztof Kieslowski writes in his interview book, Kieslowski on Kieslowski that he doesn't think family life necessarily is hard because of cinema. One might have the very same issues, even how much time one would spend with one's family. Whether you're a factory worker or a film director. Perhaps the love given in small doses is much more intense, than love in big doses.Why does the amateur destroy his film in the end? Is it because he is tired of making cinema, the frustration and misery. But the ending agrees to give us an answer. Filip doesn't give up, he turns the camera to himself, to search himself, to study himself but also to continue making films. But why did Kieslowski show Filip destroying his film? Filip has got himself in a trap, from where he cannot move. He pleased the people he didn't want to, by making the film. Kieslowski says that he never had to destroy his work, but when he was making Dworzec (1981) the police wanted to check his camera if he had accidentally filmed a murderer. That was a time when Kieslowski could've destroyed his work, because helping the government without wanting to was something he never intended to do. So Amator is a very deep film with many meanings and purposes. Compared to Kieslowski's earlier feature film, Blizna (1976) Amator is much more complex, well written, personal and altogether well done. The audience gets to experience the magic of cinema at the same time with Filip. He sees the enormous ability of influencing and witnessing events - the fascination of creation.

One of the most ambitious early works of Kieslowski, AMATOR, or CAMERABUFF is a great work, sadly not too well know by the world. I accidentally stumbled upon this film at my local video store, and noticed that Jerzy Stuhr was on the cover (the lead role). i have always liked Stuhr's acting, so i decided to pick it up. i also noticed that this was a film by K. Kieslowski, giving me even more reason to take this film out. after popping this movie into the VCR, the first thing that caught my eye was the beautiful, yet fore-shadowing, close-up, sun lit shot of the the bird (a recurring camera technique used by Kieslowski). the film was shot in a very minimalistic, and the narrative was very involving. Fascinatingly enough, the film starts out at a "high point", where all the characters seem at peace and ease, and then plunges down to a miserable low. the feeling at the end of the movie is in-describable... i recommend this Krzysztof Kieslowski film anyone really interested in his work. it was a very good early piece.