I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much

Instead, you get a movie that's enjoyable enough, but leaves you feeling like it could have been much, much more.

It is interesting even when nothing much happens, which is for most of its 3-hour running time. Read full review

This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

This lively retelling of the Burke and Hare story is entertaining enough, and also refreshingly light-hearted (funny how they always are, considering the macabre subject matter) enough to entertain the viewer throughout. It's an undeniably British film, packed with swearing, sweaty characters and loads of tame sleaze. Some scenes in this film actively resemble those cheeky sex comedies of the '70s which our country churned out, containing as they do men and women romping about in bedrooms in various states of undress.All characters in the story are present and correct, with Glynn Edwards and Derren Nesbitt actually doing very well as the eponymous duo. This pair really convey the whole sleaziness/perversity of the subject, and do so in a funny way, too; it's a good double-act. Only a painfully low budget lets the film down, robbing us of an actual ending in the meantime as well: we all know what's going to happen, but the film cuts to a drawing while the conclusion is narrated! It's a letdown, but for the majority this film is great fun.Harry Andrews is on hand to ham it as Dr Knox, here wearing an eye-patch. Sadly Knox is given little screen time in this film, as the title would suggest, although he has a fine line in crude humour. He's a long way from Cushing's spot-on performance in THE FLESH AND THE FIENDS, and it's sad to see such a great actor falling on hard times. Some other familiar faces pop up in the cast, including sitcom favourite Yootha Joyce who plays Edwards' long-suffering and occasionally murderous wife. Hammer fans will also spot LUST FOR A VAMPIRE's Yutte Stensgaard romping about half naked in one of the film's many brothel scenes, all part of a subplot included just to show lots of topless women; the stunning Francoise Pascal is also willing to oblige in this respect. Far too much screen time is also spent on some foppish medical students who get up to all sorts of sordid affairs after hours.The actual scenes of grave-robbing are dealt with accordingly, i.e. with heaps of macabre relish, although THE COMEDY OF TERRORS will always be the king of ghoulish humour in this respect. There's also a knack for detail as well, with many of the characters speaking in Scottish accents, which makes for a refreshing change. All over, this is a fun little film with plenty of spirit, which only occasionally lapses uncomfortably, and has a mischievous air about it impossible to dislike. And check out that catchy song by The Scaffold (the guys who sang Lily the Pink, no less!) which plays over the opening and closing credits!

Two men go into business supplying medical colleges with cadavers by robbing graves.What you might recall about this film more than anything else is its theme song, which is certainly rather fun and moving. Bringing this tale to life is important and a great addition to horror cinema. Sure, it had been done before as "The Body Snatcher" and "The Flesh and the Fiends"... but it is my understanding that this was the first to be so explicit in the title.The film also asks another question, perhaps philosophical or ethical: do dead bodies have value? Certainly murder is a terrible crime, but what of people who died naturally? Certainly their owners do longer need them -- why not be taken for medical science? (We now have donor cards and the like, but indeed, how were surgeons to learn their craft without practice?)

Randy William Burke (well played with considerable rascally charm by Darren Nesbitt) and his scraggly partner William Hare (robustly essayed by Glynn Edwards) are a couple of no-count grave robbers and murderers who eke out a living supplying fresh anatomical specimens to esteemed professor Dr. Knox (a deliciously hammy portrayal by Harry Andrews) of the Edinburgh Medical College in 19th century Scotland. Director Vernon Sewell, working from a racy and witty script by Ernle Bradford, relates the entertaining story at a snappy pace, offers a flavorsome evocation of the period setting, ably milks the blithely warped premise for plenty of wickedly amusing gallows humor, and further spices things up with a generous sprinkling of tasty female nudity as well as a good deal of cheerfully bawdy eroticism. The enthusiasm cast sink their teeth into the jolly depraved material with genuine zest: Nesbitt and Edwards display a lively and engaging chemistry as our titular gruesome twosome, Yootha Joyce lends fine support as the shrewish Ms. Hare, Robin Tucker contributes a likable turn as sweetly bumbling medical student Arbuthnot, and Francoise Pascal and Yutte Stensgaard are sexy and appealing as merry prostitutes Marie and Janet, respectively. Desmond Dickinson's bright and colorful cinematography gives the picture an attractive vibrant look. Roger Webb's jaunty score and the supremely catchy'n'groovy theme song by The Scaffold hit the frothy spot. Good ghoulish fun.

This is the fourth in a total of five film-versions revolving of the factual Burke & Hare murders and, although certainly not as mesmerizing and memorable as "The Flesh and the Fiends" (1959) or "The Body Snatcher" (1945), Vernon Sewell's interpretation of this macabre page in Scottish history is still a truly engaging and at times even frightening movie. It's actually unfair to compare this version with the aforementioned titles, as both those films starred famous names and perhaps even had a bit more financial means to work with. This is clearly a low-budgeted film with a very limited amount of set pieces and make-up effects, and relies mainly on atmosphere and a sinister choreography. To those that aren't really familiar with the story yet, William Burke and William Hare were two poor immigrants in Victorian Edinburgh that discovered a rather unorthodox way to get rich really fast. As cadaver-suppliers to the eminent anatomist/university professor Dr. Knox, they specialized in delivering the "freshest" corpses of all body snatchers. Of course, to keep assuring this service they quickly had to turn to murder. The main reason why "Horrors of Burke and Hare" is weaker than the other versions is because the story contains too many irrelevant elements and doesn't focuses enough on the known facts. Numerous sequences inside the fancy brothel are pretty redundant (albeit entertaining), whereas other very important aspects are seemly ignored. Like the actual interactions between Dr. Knox and his corpse suppliers, for example, or the men's dangerously increasing greed and immorality. Also, and this for the very first time, the wives of Burke and Hare are involved in the murders and I can't remember having read anything about this being the case. There's quite a lot of sleaze and gorgeous female nudity on display, which make the inaccuracy so much more endurable. Particularly the unearthly beautiful Yutte Stensgaard (the blond prostitute) and Françoise Pascal (the brunette) deserve a special mentioning. This film has its very own and totally unique title-song and that's arguable the greatest thing about it! It's an uncanny song, rather vulgarly sung and warning us all to BEWARE…of Burke & Hare. Perhaps not the best movie ever made, "The Horrors of Burke and Hare" is certainly on par with most contemporary British horror films (and actually better than Vernon Sewell's other films "The Curse of the Crimson Altar" and "The Blood Beast Terror") and it honestly deserves a wider distribution. One more film about the case came out during the mid-80's, namely "The Doctor and the Devils" starring Timothy Dalton, Jonathan Pryce and Stephen Rea.