That was an excellent one.

Excellent, smart action film.

A Masterpiece!

I like movies that are aware of what they are selling... without [any] greater aspirations than to make people laugh and that's it.

This was so awful, I would have rated it 0.5 out of 10 if that scale existed. It was painful going beyond 30 minutes...It started off slow, and never picked up and the extremely poor acting really didn't help! It really isn't worth your Sunday afternoon. At times there were awkward moments and poor direction.The storyline was so paranormally unrealistic. I wanted to believe, but I couldn't. Weak all the way around. I wanted to believe in the characters, but I did not feel a genuine love anywhere in this movie. Even though I understood the plot, nothing made sense to me. The ending was much like the rest of the film, sketchy and poorly written. I am just sorry I wasted 45 minutes of my life watching this crap...worse is the realization that it actually won awards (or so they say)

The opening mood of this picture -- the depression of a widower numb with grief -- pretty much sums up the entire film.The main character is both figuratively and literally sleepwalking through his life, and the director and actors do the same. How can a movie with supernatural aspects be so unengaging?Every scene plays out slowly, as if the somber subject matter requires it. Characters interact, but the actors fail to connect with each other, even in scenes where emotions should run high. A livelier or more varied approach by the director and/or actors would have helped. As it stands, "Back Soon" stays stuck in slow motion.

This was a first for me. A movie that was about equally good as it was horrendous. The story of two guys who find themselves in love. It's nice. The two actors have really great chemistry, which is pretty rare when you get straight guys playing gay roles. (I just have to assume both actors were straight, because they almost always are in this type of movie.) The story is interesting and wants so badly to be heartwarming, but then the writers and actors take turns messing it up. The two main actors are pretty good. The supporting cast, specifically the gay best friend (Bret Wolfe) and the wife's former working buddy (Kelly Keaton) were not so great. Wolfe took the gay stereotype into the offensive and Keaton just didn't play emotion well at all. The bad acting by those two, as well as by the prostitutes and the wife of the dead wife's brother (Bethany Dotson) lifted me entirely out of the flow of the film. I can't necessarily blame the actors. It looks like the film was very poorly directed in some spots and very well directed in others. The writing followed the same some bad/some good path. The ending was a let down and couldn't have been more predictable if it had been typed on the box. Not a great movie, not a horrible movie. I'm glad I watched it, all I can say is that I wish it'd been better.

Greetings,I have viewed the movie several times and am confused about the final scene. I loved this movie. Can any one explain the ending? Please respond privately to tvman8570@att.netMy favorite actor is Matthew Montgomery (Matthew Ramirez) and I will buy anything that in which he stars.I have seen him in (Gone But Not Forgotten), (Long Term Relationship) and (Socket).He has a beautiful Body and is a great actor. What was with the multiple tattoos?I would like to see a biography on Windham Beacham. He is handsome.Bob