everything you have heard about this movie is true.

As Good As It Gets

I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

10 out of 10 is to combat to false lower rating ,this is obviously not an oscar movie.But 4 its a lie. This movie should have its place along other underrated titles like Equilibrium ,Sunshine ,Moon 2009.Seeing is believing.

I had to create an account for Atomica. What we have here is an amazing 9/10 sci-fi movie rated 4.1 by users and 3.3 out of 10 by critics. At least I started watching this with low expectations, and they got completely blown away.The plot is original and believable, the technology bits well exposed, the tension and mystery well built.I feel terrible for the team, writer, director, actors who all did an awesome job. This is the most unfairly received movie I've ever had the chance to discover.

The people that agree with vicstevinson saying the film was sexist was low, the main problem with anything being made is lack of creativity and spending the time in coming up with something original as well as making it look better than this - in the opening part of the film, you can see a gap on the helmet of Abby (Sarah Habel), give me a break, that is just lazy, she is wearing this helmet for what reason, should be for oxygen - I thought, what other reason would there be ? I remember in working on Mr. Belvedere, on how lazy the writer's were, they would just copy other people's ideas for the show, that is what Hollywood always does, besides not being more detailed in having the surroundings looking convincing, these films are made by lazy people who unfortunately make way too much money for what they do, more like lack of what they should do, be very detailed and care more about making quality film's and television programs, earn your money, instead of cheating and being lazy, sorry but watching these film's is just frustrating, just like Ghost in the Shell, another great example of lazy - way over paid people. They seem to sit around a table and talk about how much money they can get for empty stuff, one dimensional garbage. The independent film's at least try and are not Hollywood crap driven, for the most part I believe.

Or I could be wrong, cause I don't know how much it actually cost to turn a cyclist clothing and gear into a futuristic Hazmat suit. But I'm starting off giving the movie a bad rap. It's not the best story I have come across. The lead character, Abby has an important position as some head engineer whose more theory than practice, assigned to fix one of the big nuclear reactors that is supplying power to the whole world, but after meeting the two men who operate the station she finds the problem bigger than expected. What I really liked about the movie is the art direction. The cycle riding turned Hazmat suit was actually pretty cool, and it does not hurt that the lead actress was wearing it well. I really like the set that the film takes place on. I don't know if they made it or found a place but it looked like the greatest Sci-fi ever, and was a main character on it's own that made the movie worth looking at. It's one of those small movies with only three people that included Dominic Monaghan and Tom Sizemore who I must admit were not really worth mentioning in a story that's OK and done OK, that moves fast enough not to bore you and has a great set that almost makes up for a lot of it's short comings.