hyped garbage

Admirable film.

Blistering performances.

The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.

This 5-minute movie from Edison studios was made eight years after Georges Méliès's "A Trip to the Moon" and while other reviewers have been calling it a knockoff of this film, I disagree. This movie may be much shorter and more simplistic, but the effects are amazing, and honestly are just as good as those in Méliès's film.The story of the movie is very fast-paced and doesn't slow down. Basically, a scientist discovers an anti-gravity formula and uses it on various objects. However, he accidentally spills some on himself and ends up on mars where he's threatened by various tree-like creatures who threaten to snatch him (which are convincing even today). Then, some giant martian gets him and turns him into what looks like a snowball (too bad the edits here were much too obvious) and tries roasting the guy over a fire but he escapes and gets back to earth. There's a twist at the very end where the scientist spills the formula on the floor and makes the room spin.Like I said, amazing effects. Many of them are very convincing even today, and at only 5 minutes this is pretty entertaining (although some of this could come from the fact that the YouTube uploading I've seen had some fun piano music with it). Even today I think most people would find it very watchable--and that's saying something.

In 1902, Georges Méliès created a landmark film, "The Trip to the Moon". While very primitive by today's standards, it was years ahead of its time and still is a joy to watch. It's the fanciful story of a trip to the moon and many studios ripped off the film-- making nearly identical (though always technically inferior) versions of the movie and passing them off as the original. Well, this isn't exactly the case with Edison's "A Trip to Mars". It's not a copy but is obviously inspired by the earlier film...but, sadly, although debuting eight years later, it's STILL not even close to the original in quality.The film is an episodic story of a scientist who creates an anti- gravity formula. Using it, he flies to Mars...but much of this trip is strangely absent. Once there, he finds the place inhabited by giants and they torment him. Ultimately, he returns to Earth.The film features many special effects and camera tricks--some of which worked very well and some which appear sloppy. Interesting and worth a look...but far from brilliant or groundbreaking.

Everyone knows about A Trip to The Moon. One of the first science fiction films it was a major milestone in film history. So when Thomas Edison was making films under his studio he decided to make an All American remake. Instead of a giant bullet, it's a scientist discovering reverse gravity. And instead of going to the moon, he goes to Mars. One step beyond. Well the scientist get's discovered by Martians, and he is soon sent back home by the giant overlord Martian. The scientist throws something on the ground and the room starts to spin. Just saying that description will make you laugh. But still it is pretty impressive. And the special effects are good. It's not as good as A Trip To The Moon but I still have to give it credit.

An interesting piece of movie which is based entirely on H. G. Wells book. Melies "A Trip to the Moon" is based mostly on J. Verne's book "From The Earth to the Moon" and has elements from Wells book "The First Men in the Moon" (Wells mentions that the moon is inhabited by Selenites and about huge plants and also in Verne's book they never get to step on the moon). In this movie, like in Wells book, the scientist discovers a substance which defies gravity (in the book it's a new material called cavorite) which helps him travel up in the air and straight to Mars! There he finds strange creatures and an environment different from Earth. He manages to get back to his house and in a strange twist he spills the substance on the floor. It is not as good as Melie's movie but is fun small piece of history. If you like the short "magic films" of this era than is a must. You have to love the way they brought fantasy into life and the way they used the means they had at the time to make this possible.