A Christmas Carol
A Christmas Carol
| 28 November 2004 (USA)
A Christmas Carol Trailers

Miser Ebenezer Scrooge is awakened on Christmas Eve by spirits who reveal to him his own miserable existence, what opportunities he wasted in his youth, his current cruelties, and the dire fate that awaits him if he does not change his ways. Scrooge is faced with his own story of growing bitterness and meanness, and must decide what his own future will hold: death or redemption.

Reviews
Cebalord

Very best movie i ever watch

... View More
Noutions

Good movie, but best of all time? Hardly . . .

... View More
JinRoz

For all the hype it got I was expecting a lot more!

... View More
Logan

By the time the dramatic fireworks start popping off, each one feels earned.

... View More
TheBogieFan

Takes far too many liberties with the story, Scrooge's family history during the Ghost Of Christmas Past section doesn't fit in with the usual versions and it spoils it, without giving too much away the back story between him and his father is changed entirely and he doesn't go to boarding school....It seems to miss or mess up pretty much every important scene in the story, why would anyone do that?I'm not a big musicals fan though I must admit that the songs are generally quite good but the divergences from the standard A Christmas Carol storyline really grate; I turned it off part way through The Ghost Of Christmas Present - considering I paid for the DVD that's not a good sign.Get the Alistair Sim classic, or the acclaimed George C. Scott version, or the surprisingly good Muppet Christmas Carol but avoid at all costs this mess of a film.

... View More
TheLittleSongbird

This film isn't that bad, not perfect, but a long way from being awful. I still consider the Alistair Sim film the definitive version of the timeless story. Well, the best asset has to be Kelsey Grammar's Scrooge. He was brilliant, very good acting and even better at singing. It may be just me, but Grammar does have a fine baritone voice. The other performances are well done, especially Jesse E. Martin and Jane Krakowski(she looked stunning). Jason Alexander does a good job as Jacob Marley and Jennifer Love Hewitt is truly lovely here. It is true that some of the accents are not that great though, and the script isn't given as much detail as there is so evidently in the period detail and the music. And I know there have been complaints of the film straying from the original story, which it does at times. For a TV musical, the production values weren't bad at all. The set designs were excellent and the costumes ravishing. Even the special effects are decent, and I have seen TV movies when they have been appalling. The music is great, the score is beautiful and the songs are hummable. Some are stronger than others, but there are many other musicals out there that are like that as well. In conclusion not bad, not perfect though, but it is worth the look. 8/10 Bethany Cox

... View More
slasheuse

With music from the composer of Beauty and the Beast and Aladdin, it's not hard to see why this striking reworking of the classic is such a success. I can't over-emphasise how great the music in this film is; strong, dependable themes with some of the best lyrics I've ever heard in a musical.Visually, some of the filmmakers' decisions are very bold (the costumes of the Ghost of Christmas Past and the Ghost of Christmas Yet To Come), but it's important to remember that most of what we think of as "normal" for the ghosts' costumes in musical versions of the novel have NOTHING to do with Dickens' version anyway. In the actual book, the first Ghost is an old man; usually on film it's played as a child and Jane Krakowski's version is a fully-grown woman. In fact, this adaptation is actually MUCH closer to the book than the better-known film versions; the two children Ignorance and Want are included, and the book's religious (don't worry, it's not too heavy) and social messages are brought to the fore. The reworking of Scrooge's early life surprised me a bit, but it was very plausibly done, presumably to reflect Charles Dickens's own early experiences. Jennifer Love Hewitt is unexpectedly brilliant as Emily (though I don't get why they changed her name).And... I was holding my breath, preparing to be appalled by the accents, but Grammar is fine. His wig is awful, but he's pretty good, and sings well. Most of the accents are brilliant, and there are lots of strong British ensemble stars such as Ruthie Henshall. The music is fab. My mum bought this for me as a possibly-ironic Christmas present, and our whole family loved it. Give it a try!

... View More
sunny lovett (dwtaxi)

I have seen quite a few versions of A Christmas Carol in my time and this is without a doubt the worst adaption of Charles Dickens greatest work ever made. Poor casting, bad acting, uninspired and prolonged dance scenes, scatty songs which certainly do not stir the heart and a rather over the top approach whenever they feel the need to depart from the original script. The film appears to have been a deliberate and disastrously failed attempt at humour, at least one hopes so as that is the only thing that could excuse casting Kelsey Grammar as Scrooge. He does not pass muster as a dramatic actor. Do not waste your time with this musical, it isn't worth it.If you want to see a truly inspired adaption you can't go past Scrooge (1951), which after fifty years still remains superb. If you want to see the truest version of the story then George C. Scott's 1984 portrayal is best. If you want something a little lighter to show the children, then The Muppet Christmas Carol (1992) is another excellent adaption with some wonderful songs. If you want a cartoon then the 1971 version with Scrooge's Alastair Sim reprising his role.I would advise sticking to Scrooge though and maybe the Muppet's on a back shelf. Grammar's 'Carol is simply is terrible.

... View More