40 Days and Nights
40 Days and Nights
PG | 15 December 2012 (USA)
40 Days and Nights Trailers

When a colossal tectonic shift causes the sea level to start rising, a microbiologist gathers the DNA of as many species as she can, while the military creates an "ark" in a desperate attempt to preserve life on Earth.

Reviews
GamerTab

That was an excellent one.

... View More
Vashirdfel

Simply A Masterpiece

... View More
Gutsycurene

Fanciful, disturbing, and wildly original, it announces the arrival of a fresh, bold voice in American cinema.

... View More
Zlatica

One of the worst ways to make a cult movie is to set out to make a cult movie.

... View More
Paul Magne Haakonsen

This is a very, very generic disaster movie to make it out from the minds at the people at The Asylum. And if you have already seen just a single other disaster movie at any point, then you have essentially also already seen "40 Days and Nights".The storyline is a straight out of the how-to-make-a-disaster-movie manuscript. A global storm of biblical proportions hits the Earth, and the survival of mankind rests in the hands of just a few Americans. It has all been seen before.The CGI effects were ranging from being adequate to being downright ludicrous and horrible to bear witness to. And the constant rain on the screen was the worst; when they used CGI rain, which was quite often, it looked so fake that it was just embarrassing to look at.There were no famous people in this movie, and for obvious reasons you might add. The acting in "40 Days and Nights" was wooden and stiff, as to be expected from a movie of this caliber."40 Days and Nights" is not worth the time or effort, and not really worth the $2 I spent on the DVD. A very typical disaster of a typical disaster movie from the creative minds of the people at The Asylum (or lack thereof).

... View More
regular-guy-ottawa-area

I can't help but wonder if this film, Super Cyclone, and 500MPH Storm were all made on the same weekend. All 3 of these disaster films are disasters. Everyone else comments on the acting, continuity, and bad SFX and CGI, but I have to speak to honeybees. Unreal. Thousands of Americans are beekeepers. There would be farms all over the states with rainproof hives. The entire continent had not yet been flooded - yet instead of just calling up a honey farm, Tess and company fly (and somehow land a huge ass plane on a rocky hill beside a CLIFF..?) to papier mache caves to try to find bees where no bees would every be? This movie is Painful. I haven't even finished watching it.

... View More
somewon1966

Wow. Bad. Just really bad. The movie starts you off by dropping yo right into the middle of the disaster already in progress with no real explanation or back story. You have to completely forget everything you learned in grade school science class or even your Sunday school class. There is a real problem with any of it being remotely plausible, & a real problem with continuity. It seems like it is trying to be a low & I do mean a very low budget version of 2012, with out any of those pesky things like a story, character development, a good script, dialogue, any resemblance what soever in not the this reality but even in an alternate universe. The Star Trek movies were actually more believable, that's bad.

... View More
da-Peter

Wow,the worst movie I ever watched as far as I can remember. This one has nothing good. Even the Intro here on IMDb is wrong. It talks about a tectonic shift but its a storm front. I just wonder where the storm is drawing all the water from to flood the whole world, Mars maybe?They save DNA from honey bees and bees to save the world? What about cattle? And the storm grows exponentially, every day 200 miles ^^. They even flipped over science and physics. They build a ark out of concrete walls, nice ;) The only thing which was a little, but just a little bit, realistic, was the first couple minutes when the 4 people cruised around in the so called "Sahara Desert"...Don't watch it....

... View More